New Humanism and Its Major Proponents
Introduction
New Humanism was an important literary and cultural movement in the United States during the early twentieth century (1910–1930). It was influenced by the ideas of Matthew Arnold, who emphasized the preservation of “the best that has been thought and said.” The movement arose as a reaction against industrialization, materialism, and the deterministic outlook of modern science.
Main Features of New Humanism
The New Humanists opposed the dominant literary theories of realism and naturalism, which viewed human beings as controlled by heredity and environment. Instead, they emphasized:
Moral Centrality – Human life is essentially moral and ethical
Human Uniqueness – Humans possess intellectual and spiritual superiority
Free Will – Human beings are not completely determined by external forces
Classical Values – Emphasis on restraint, order, and discipline
Opposition to Romanticism – Rejection of emotional excess and subjectivity
Thus, New Humanism aimed to restore ethical criticism and classical standards in literature.
Major Proponents
1. Irving Babbitt (1865–1933)
Irving Babbitt was the chief leader and theoretician of New Humanism.
He opposed Romanticism, realism, and naturalism
Advocated moral discipline, self-control, and classical restraint
Believed literature should guide ethical behaviourMajor Works:
Literature and the American College (1908)
The New Laokoön (1910)
Rousseau and Romanticism (1919) – critique of Jean-Jacques Rousseau
Democracy and Leadership (1924)
On Being Creative (1932)
He provided the philosophical foundation of New Humanism and extended its ideas to education and politics.
2. Paul Elmer More (1864–1937)
Paul Elmer More was a leading essayist and critic of the movement.
Emphasized moral and ethical criticism
Supported classical tradition and restraint
Opposed naturalistic writers like Theodore Dreiser and Sinclair Lewis
Major Works:
Shelburne Essays (1904–1921)
The Greek Tradition (1924–31)
Platonism (1917)
The Religion of Plato (1921)
He popularized New Humanist ideas through essays and reinforced the importance of moral values in literature.
Other Contributors
Norman Foerster
Critic of the movement: H. L. Mencken
Decline of New Humanism
By the 1930s, New Humanism declined because:
It was criticized as elitist and conservative
It resisted modern literary developments
New critical approaches replaced it
Conclusion
New Humanism played a significant role in restoring moral and classical values in literary criticism. Through thinkers like Irving Babbitt and Paul Elmer More, it offered a strong alternative to deterministic and materialistic views of human life, even though its influence diminished over time.
Comments
Post a Comment